Given some of the vitriol handed out on the SBR threads , I am somewhat reluctant to make this post . It is factual , and verifiable , but I am not interested in incoming hostility . Negativity is a waste of energy .Please stop reading if that's your focus . I’m focussed on the NOW . It is not intended to induce anyone to invest in SBR shares , it is only information .Mineral exploration is a risky business .
Yesterday (am ) I sent off the following enquiry to SBR HQ :
“.....Now , help me here , theoretically :
From memory , I recall much bigger EM anomalies ( from SBNCannouncements ) along strike , to the East of our existing JORC resource. Some Kms along strike , maybe too far apart to be fed by the one sulphidepipe , but on our original tenements .
And , I recall we have also pegged additional ground to the East of theoriginal tenements along the Scholl Shear Zone . .
Is Jon's mineralisation theory that we may have multiple feeder systemsalong strike to create repeat disseminated ore bodies and associated feederzones .?....”
Here is the response that I received ( after the market closed ) :
".....In answer to your questions , there are Indeed, multiple EManomalies along strike from the disseminated sulphide resource at Sherlock Bay,covered by both the Mining Lease and in the new Sherlock Pool JVground. There is potential for multiple feeders and/or multipleaccumulations of massive sulphides at base of intrusion or in footwall.
There has been no previous drilling targeting massive sulphides.
Deeper penetrating EM is required as well as downhole EM. The EMequipment used nowadays is generally much more powerful . The last EM done wasin 1998!
We are planning more EM as well as gravity and we intend to drill asap......”
Now below is the announcement from SBNC that I could remember readingsome years ago .
The magnitude of the EM anomalies along strike always presented as awhat if ? opportunity to me .
Now , with the emergence of Jon’s new mineralisation theory , the starsmay finally be aligning ??
I’ll leave this post as factual without expressing any personal views .Others can salivate , or denigrate , as the case may be .
DYOR
Regards
Q
(20min delay)