@Silent-Bubbles "I don't think they would have to ' Jointly ' agree for a re-start of the NAL Carbonate ' Chemicals Plant ' as for starters Piedmont is only 25% stakeholder , and so if the Majority stakeholder being Sayona and I.Q decided that the Lithium Carbonate re-start was a ' Goer ' - With our without Piedmont , the Hierarchical FIRST paragraph order of where the spodumene concentrate went to would be NAL Carbonate ....THEN Piedmont."
let official announcements dictate fact:
Read this slowly....
https://sayonamining.com.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SYA_NAL-restart_28-Jun-22.pdf
Page 3:
Conditions of offtakeagreement
If Sayona and Piedmont agree to jointly develop and operate a lithium chemical plant,
including a restart of the lithium carbonate plant at North American Lithium or another
lithium chemical plant at a different location, then the partners agree that the order of
priority for production volume of spodumene concentrate from North American Lithium
will be:
1. Jointly‐owned lithium chemical plant
2. Piedmont volume under the offtake agreement
3. Third parties
and if they do not agree then the original offtake order stands. If spot prices stay elevated there is zero reason PLL would agree, but you keep typing away
@Silent-Bubbles "I don't think they would have to ' Jointly '...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 127 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.6¢ |
Change
-0.002(5.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $370.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.7¢ | 3.7¢ | 3.5¢ | $2.158M | 59.44M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 2625000 | 3.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7¢ | 5881377 | 21 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |