Agreement is already implied by the fact that PLL has a 25% interest in SQY, SYA has the voting power by way of their 75% interest.
PLL might refuse to pay their contribution to a carbonate plant however it doesnt exclude them form still having a joint interest in the plant by way of their 25% ownership.
The only way they could do what you suggest is by selling their 25% stake, which still wouldnt stop the priority of the SC6 going to a future carbonate/hydroxide palnt.
I think you are just trying to stir the pot for some reason, whatever floats your boat I guess.
Stop speculating on something you are not qualified on.
Ann: Sayona & Piedmont Formally Approve NAL Restart, page-61
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.6¢ |
Change
0.002(5.88%) |
Mkt cap ! $370.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.4¢ | 3.7¢ | 3.4¢ | $2.402M | 67.37M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 8880005 | 3.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6¢ | 3759224 | 17 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 14/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |