So reading the above, the priority is off take funding for NS.
And only in the case that they MLV want to advance exploration to the copper properties, would they then introduce this third party investor into MLV. (which they have two of that are interested) Otherwise conserve cash, and keep the 50-50 partnership into NS development.
But there you have it, the proposed first cash cow, pending off take funding.
What are the odds if the hook is already baited, then that these two fish are pulled in ? The market would look favorably with both off take funding for NS, AND further cash injection but the MLV becomes a three way JV. etc.
What comes first - Off take funding ? /=> potential JV cash injection. ?
Either are significant price catalysts, when betting on an 11m mc company, to un lock its dominoes of assets.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Scoping Study Completed for Nueva Sabana Mine, Cuba
So reading the above, the priority is off take funding for...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 89 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AAU (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
-0.001(25.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.567M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.3¢ | $4.674K | 1.189M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
74 | 71814221 | 0.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.4¢ | 73078694 | 50 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
69 | 65812556 | 0.003 |
51 | 68425069 | 0.002 |
13 | 28679950 | 0.001 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.004 | 73078694 | 50 |
0.005 | 17607556 | 12 |
0.006 | 7500755 | 7 |
0.007 | 2472191 | 4 |
0.008 | 4875000 | 7 |
Last trade - 15.42pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AAU (ASX) Chart |