If I forget by the next investor meeting, can one of us please ask the company as to why they use MD in reporting the depths as opposed to TVDss. It would make life so much simpler for investors. For example, SE3 came in unexpectedly downdip of SE1. What I want to know is whether that means the assumed lowest known GWC level has been lowered. As MD is used, it doesn't mean much since the drill path is never vertical nor linear.
618
Ann: SE3 confirms continuity at South Erregulla, page-307
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
17.3¢ |
Change
-0.008(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $508.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.0¢ | 18.0¢ | 17.0¢ | $543.6K | 3.093M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | 2124358 | 17.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 17.5¢ | 1049715 | 37 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.38am 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |