Ann: Second Supplementary Scheme Booklet, page-124

There is the old saying concerning the consulting profession - "Tell us what you want and we will get it for you".

Is that the reason for the assumption in the valuation of ResAppDx for the Scheme that it would only be used 31 times out of every 20,000 patients visiting their GP - even though respiratory issues are the major reason for visits?

Is that what was necessary to do in order to come up with 20.8 cents?

I have detailed the consequences to us of that (literally) incredible assumption previously (link below) in another thread.

If the BDO Corporate Services website listed a Healthcare specialist would we have been given a different value? I certainly think so. I can't see a Healthcare specialist being prepared to be seen making an assumption like that.

poorinvestor

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/valuing-resapp-health.6736339/page-439?post_id=63060062