You can make these statements but if the assays don't pop with gold you've got nothing at that depth. The copper results would truly need to be outrageously good for a mine at that depth.
I wouldn't want to be someone not all over the story and read comments such as these. Outrageously good bornite-chalocite copper mineralisation should imply mineable mineralisation. Does outrageously good mean mineable or just something fitting in with an acedemic model? If it's just conformation of acedemic model "outrageously good" mineralisation then I think the comments could easily be misinterpreted for the uninitiated.
From my reading of the announcement, "outrageously good" probably means academically outrageously good and not mineably outrageously good. Still looking south is the message and probably also looking for a CR as well. This TG exploration has been successful at one thing, mining the market. Esh
