I’m no legal eagle, but I suspect that the “aggrieved 5%” may be technically in trouble because of the way they have gone about things. My understanding is that if the 249D notice is given prior to the 203 D notice, as it was, then the company does not have to call a meeting. Where do we go from here?
I just hope we aren’t going to use precious funding on sorting out legal claptrap.
I'm all for the 5% crew to have the opportunity to clearly state their grievances, but not to pay for their incompetence (if my interpretation above is correct).
Equally, I would like to read GC’s rebuttal of whatever the allegations might be.
The board must be very confused & conflicted on this matter. Not a good look for all associated stakeholders, the SEQ ‘hem’ is visibly waving in the breeze.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SEQ
- Ann: Section 203D Notice
Ann: Section 203D Notice, page-39
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SEQ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
39.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $48.48M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
39.0¢ | 41.0¢ | 39.0¢ | $135.8K | 342.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 3394 | 38.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
39.0¢ | 5384 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 3394 | 0.385 |
4 | 150000 | 0.370 |
2 | 12739 | 0.365 |
2 | 101667 | 0.360 |
2 | 50050 | 0.350 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.390 | 5384 | 1 |
0.400 | 50000 | 1 |
0.410 | 10316 | 1 |
0.430 | 20000 | 1 |
0.440 | 12048 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SEQ (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online