Last time the vote was relatively close (55-45). Makes sense to me that this action would be pursued once again given the potential that shareholders who previously voted against the resolutions may be frustrated by the suspension. This time instead of seeking to remove just Mr Mcglinn, this is an attempt to remove the entire current board (which imo may be a little bold).
Hopefully the board will soon have more details regarding the operational audit, will be able to release updated financials and deal with any other matters. I appreciate that the board couldn't give a timeframe for these things to be carried out and am happy to be somewhat patient, however, my patience is not unlimited.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Section 249D Notice Received
Last time the vote was relatively close (55-45). Makes sense to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 60 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add X64 (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
57.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $129.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
X64 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online