Last time the vote was relatively close (55-45). Makes sense to...

Last time the vote was relatively close (55-45). Makes sense to me that this action would be pursued once again given the potential that shareholders who previously voted against the resolutions may be frustrated by the suspension. This time instead of seeking to remove just Mr Mcglinn, this is an attempt to remove the entire current board (which imo may be a little bold).

Hopefully the board will soon have more details regarding the operational audit, will be able to release updated financials and deal with any other matters. I appreciate that the board couldn't give a timeframe for these things to be carried out and am happy to be somewhat patient, however, my patience is not unlimited.