It is very disappointing the meeting triggered by the 249d...

It is very disappointing the meeting triggered by the 249d request will be before the results of Q4 can be published in the 4c. I think the best course of action is seeing if the new team can make progress against the stated aim of cashflow breakeven by December 21. If there is traction in the Q4 4c I would want the new team to stay. As far as I have seen the December 21 deadline for cashflow breakeven is the first concrete date provided by the company. Previously comments on this topic did no have a committed date. I also understood this date commitment from the business was the result of strong shareholder feedback, which is why the 249d notice is so perplexing. Perhaps it's a case of major shareholders feeling left out?

Does this ring true to anyone?