Ann: Section 708A Notice and Appendix 2A, page-87

First 87 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Runandjump27

169 Posts.

59

02/07/20

11:38

Post #: 45593706
Share

Originally posted by Red bar: ↑

Good morning investors

My general synopsis is that Tony Keating is and has always been very risk-averse. I believe he would have sold half and kept the other half for the future. TK is not a wealthy man and would have almost certainly borrowed to pay for his options. Has done the responsible thing and it is what I would do if I was in his shoes as well... rip the band-aid off now, get it over and done with, people will move on.. At the end of the day he still gets to keep 10 million shares that's a lot of shares in anyone's books. The off-market trade most likely would have gone through ResApp's brokers being Morgan's. Did whoever the shares go to fulfill the needs of the institution/ investors shoes? Are they hungry for more? . Could this be the reason why the share price was being held for so long down at this level? This arrangement was probably organised some time ago.. those buggers kept the share price down for so long so they could benefit. Seems logical to me... now the brakes can be taken off this and it can be allowed to run hard! Well played I applaud you... now let's move on!!! anchors away....

Cheers

Red bar

Expand

Good points and balanced view Red I like your posts.

But do you really think Morgan’s would have been manipulating the share price?

RAP Price at posting: 17.0¢ Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

I88

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

ASX Market Open: Australian futures to rise on strong US performances

ADD

Adavale to become South Australia's newest uranium explorer

FWD

Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm

HAR

Termite mounds lead the way to 45ppm uranium for Haranga