"Not really, its all publicly available.....".Seems to me many...

"Not really, its all publicly available.....".

Seems to me many of your earlier comments don't appear to be publicly available at all - I quote your earlier post:

"For everyone wondering whether the market is right or wrong and what are the causes of the sp fall. Here's one perspective given to me by an insto adviser.
"The science may be excellent but CU6 lost the opportunity to demonstrate the science when the FDA disallowed a head to head comparison. And while a local Australian hospital (with affiliations) is attempting to do a study, this means little internationally. He believed a local study smelt of desperation by AT. The view given was that with the long lead time to commercialisation, other products and domination of the industry by BP would neuter the great science. The other point he made was that AT had also hung his hat on a cheaper product and this is also no longer valid."

That to me is more about an unknown "insto advisor". It's always convenient to refer to an unknown party.

But then perhaps i simply suffer from cognitive dissonance. I certainly wouldn't easily believe an anonymous poster on HC, with 8 posts, who refers to some unknown "insto advisor".