Aware this post might be moderated, yet we live in...

Aware this post might be moderated, yet we live in reality.
Business is business however accountability is accountability. In business, deals are proposed all the time yet a done deal is reality. ‘Quay’s’ good will on remittance must now be due by the IPB board as continuing to be amiss of accountability, hence it might be time for different measures accountable by the board.
Living in hope, being stung along or other is suggestive that the original deal was ‘too good to be true’ mentally. As we know, if it’s too good to be true it is likely not going to be so.
Ultimatums test validity and accountability: for example, set dates of expected funding placed by the board to Quay; an upfront ‘good will’ of, say, 1 million by x date then x date for remaining 1st tranch, and so on. Or, proposed deal is of whereby a duty to it’S shareholders responsible. Of course, accountability at the next generation meeting will be determined by its shareholders towards the company’s board representation.
No hard words here, simply business and elimination the ‘waving of the carrot’ principal in order of true governess.
Just my opinion, what do others holders think?