>Seems you are substantially against any reason for criticism of...

>Seems you are substantially against any reason for criticism of the failures to give shareholders any consideration with your continual upramping

Oh, you're right, how silly of me.

My bags, where are my bags, this company is terrible, its been 18 months and they had 55 million dollars and now they don't have 55 million dollars it's a failure, such a failure.

I'm not "upramping" - the things you point at as "failures" are not failures. They're just things you don't know anything about.

I am critical. Their communications are terrible. I don't know as much as I'd like. But we can hardly have a critical discussion when the level of discourse that surrounds the company is "I don't know what they're doing or understand it and this means failure". The discussion needs to move past that to get into productive territory.

But you're right, I'll just be quiet now. Good work. Only negativity allowed in the thread now.

"Wheres the 55 million its gone omg they have lamborghinis now".