'The Hall Proceeding settlement, the shareholder
claimants scheme and the senior lenders scheme are all conditional on each other and each component must
be approved before all can take effect as a combined group of measures to restructure the Company.'
The interdependencies here represent a complete and utter f up imo. Failure points all over it. We already knew they were conditional so why repeat it? Is it a warning to holders that they better bend over and vote for the recap if they want their cup of coffee on MB? Does this possibly indicate management have concerns about the senior lenders proposal getting over the line? The MB settlement was a joke anyway. The amount had insulted eligible holders without providing any answers as to how a billion dollars was flushed down the toilet, and without admission of any wrongdoing to boot. The settlement also did nothing for the current sp except for a short lived rally of a few cents. Vote no to the recap and raise Hall from the ashes.. so what. Vote no. Gltah
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SGH
- Ann: Settlement of Hall Proceeding
Ann: Settlement of Hall Proceeding, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 71 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SGH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online