Ann: Shallow high grades up to 25.93g/t Au at Hilditch gold, page-7

Wondering if the resubmission of samples for assaying from the Wattle Dam offset area drilling is due to nuggety effects, hence the need for larger intervals to be tested. Makes sense, meaning that if the assaying to date was showing nothing then to say as they state that the results exhibit variances outside their QAQC tolerances would not make sense. So sounds to me that some significant nuggety effects ( as per historical Wattle Dam) are occuring, which need to be "smoothed out" by assaying larger sample volumes. Seems like a good omen to me.