Yawn.Like you are bored. I don't believe you are bored. iMSCs...

Yawn.

Like you are bored. I don't believe you are bored.

iMSCs are consistent.

You post an entire doctoral thesis (which I will read - but it wasn't what I asked you for - I asked your for a paper on DFU which is what we were talking about) - published 23 April 2023 (so during share price placement - cap raising period when information would have been of interest to all shareholders - which you say you have from pfeifer - so he has had for some time - but he didn't share it).

But then you don't open it to see if it actually supports your contention that iMSCs are consistent - you just assert it? You don't go to the relevant sections of the thesis to pick up the specific reference I made to it?

I haven't read it all - obviously yet - but I saw this part









my fellow mushroom @pfeifer1982 shared this with me

I don't believe I called you a mushroom or pfeifer - I believe I said that cynata was treating its shareholders like mushrooms by not putting out meaningful scientific information in its announcements but not releasing information in things like posters and papers when those were referenced in the announcements. You have to go specifically asking for it - and then - well its someones's thesis. Well dammit someone's thesis was done using some other peoples shareholdings.

No it doesn't really ease my anxiety to know that information is being given out selectively. Or that you apparently think that that is okay. Or that pfeifer does - yippee they spilled us a tidbit of information - this could even be an unfair advantage for us. Seriously?

There shouldn't be a market of insider information based on currying favors. That's wrong.

Had you offered a DFU paper that would have been a meaningful relevant communication between you and I. I wasn't being disrespectful to you.

You didn't have to do it in a hurry. But you reply with yawn and throw over something pfeifer gave you and don't even unpack it to show that it support your argument that iMSCs are consistent?

iMSCs in the context of the paper (and the doctoral thesis) are induced Mesenchymal stem cells - there are three batches of cymerus cells - I was right about that - and there is a FCDI batch.

There will be information in the thesis of interest - but its not about DFU and we should have had that information (all shareholders equally not some selectively) during the capital raising.