Ann: Shareholder letter and Member's Statement, page-7

Interesting how the company had to put some stuff over the top of the letter - but could not deny the "Resolutions Of Dilution"... oooh

"investors control the share price"? > what about if instead of increasing the executive directors ca$h and bonu$e$, because they have around a third of the shares already, there was a double or triple of the previous dividend? Would that not improve the appetite for a yielding $hare?

Consider yourself an actual investor, who always looks at what the execs are getting, and if they are already well $hare$ / option$ / $alary incentivized, and you see them turning on the money tap for themselves, are you not concerned (1) the cost to the company (2) they will do it again and again or (3) how it turns off other investors and tanks the share price?

Rookies don't read the PnL, Balance Sheet, and Cash Flow, and then look at PE ratio, yield, etc to do the math on the fundamentals. Lots of money to execs takes away profit. Less profit, less value to you investors. And by your math, less investors, less SP.