I’m just wondering if the board actually sees what politicians and ‘greenies’ are both wanting, but realising it won’t come without cost.
So- are AGL moving towards having a dirty 1/2 and a clean 1/2- you CANT HAVE BOTH.
Politicians know it’s going to cost going green, and also cost huge transitioning from coal, etc. They also know that like in SA a few years ago- people don’t like not having electricity or being restricted- even when this was caused by enviro conditions.
People like ‘Gretchen’ demand change- but realistically it costs big money- and the common person can state we need change- but who pays?
AGL having a dirty and clean side solves both long term- gets support from Govts & People- to a degree!?
Ann: Shareholder letter in relation to AGL's proposed demerger, page-26
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AGL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$11.63 |
Change
-0.170(1.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.824B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $11.78 | $11.81 | $11.62 | $41.69M | 3.565M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | $11.63 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $11.65 | 14475 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AGL (ASX) Chart |