My guess is that they were meant to be for 3 different directors...

My guess is that they were meant to be for 3 different directors but just (in error - how else would they do it?) re-issued the same announcement 3 times! Classic APG management stuff-up is my guess - but happy as always to be corrected...
If this is true, then I would have though that someone in the ASX might have picked it up (the error) before release? Maybe they're not so smart either...

sasa (incredulous at how low the bar can go in this company)