Over two years ago, I was told by some that my arguments about the high MC (at that time it was over$200 million!!) were irrelevant because I was failing to factor in "potential" and that if I was to return in a few months or a year then the MC would be justified. Well, two years on I am repeating my criticism and from this latest report see no reason to change my stance.
lol, 2 years ago the share price was the same as it is now. So I guess if it's been 2 years then the marketcap is justified? Or what justifies a marketcap? The only time the marketcap has been $200mill was a very brief period when it hit above 11c. If I remember correctly you've been calling the marketcap too high for years (vaguely remember you making sub 4c calls when pressed for a fair marketcap) yet here it is still at same levels it was 2 years ago.
You were WRONG so please don't give us this holier than holy tripe.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Ann: Shareholder Update June Quarter 2016-OBJ.AX
Ann: Shareholder Update June Quarter 2016-OBJ.AX, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
TLX
Telix jumps 11.6% as US government indicates proposed medicare changes won't affect prostate cancer drug
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable