What are you talking about, why not use technology to pinpoint...

What are you talking about, why not use technology to pinpoint what you have and where.

If you can drill a hole and then tell what is 50 to 80 metres all around the hole, all the length of the hole why not use it.

The next hole will give them more info, not just within the hole but also from DHEM.
For instance if they hit massive sulphide in core of hole 2 the DHEM will give them a very good idea of the size and scope of it without drilling.

For instance if the DHEM shows the strike is open to 50 metres they could drill another hole 50 or 70 metres away to see how much further it goes.

More bang for their drilling buck, to ignore proven technology and just drill holes at will is not cost effective.

I suppose the same way a metal detector is used instead of randomly digging holes.

No it is not the same news, it has detected larger and more concentrated sulphides up to massive sulphides which is a geological term for grade, concentration and volume in close proximity to the hole.

Because the market has not reated as some expect or want does not mean the technology does not work or they are doing the wrong thing.

DHEM is not new and has a good track record.
https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/examples-of-dhem-in-nickel-sulphide-exploration-within-the-kambal