Why would SIG current management agree to buy the businesses at 10 to 15 times profit earnings when chemists usually sell for 3 to 4 times profit earnings ie 3 times the price of amsuch businesses? It values SIG at ZERO VALUE imo
DYOR
Slater and Gordon did it years ago but as a listed company it did not work.
Why would SIG current management agree to buy the businesses at...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SIG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.27 |
Change
0.010(0.79%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.072B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.26 | $1.29 | $1.26 | $5.492M | 4.321M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3920 | $1.27 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.28 | 4691 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SIG (ASX) Chart |