re: Ann: Significant Copper/Gold Anomalism Co... "Please tell me...

re: Ann: Significant Copper/Gold Anomalism Co... "Please tell me I am wrong!"

Ok, lotz :"You're wrong!" lol. Well, that's what you wanted to hear, mate?

But, seriously, now....
What that means is that they have replicated and thus confirmed the validity of, the original surface geochem anomaly at a greater depth, below the paleo activity and running sands, thus proving that the original anomaly was truly bedrock related and and not due to drainage/transported material as I had personally feared COULD have been the case.
The reason for the low values is that the top of the saprolite sampled is weathered and depleted of most values. These values should increase as drilling progresses deeper into fresh rock.
So, its all good news, the anomaly has been re-confirmed, and we can look forward to an exciting deeper drilling program......and start dreaming of elephants again.
It also confirms that the sampling method is working and can be validly applied across the whole area. I'm happy that it worked through the paleo levels, because sometimes it doesnt.
THANKS STEVE, for allaying our doubts & concerns. Is the RC rig on site yet? lol.
Looks good again, lotz, .....how good it will be can only be determined by deep drilling.
Selling down to 5.8c again, so someone wasnt excited by the results.....

So, back to waiting.....and waiting.....


GZ