Given there is 300-ish metres of barren cover, I am wondering why they didn't just bang a vertical drill hole into the Mag target to the west of hole ESA01, as others have said, 0.3m of 2% Cu isn't going to cut it with that much cover, and they are going to need to find an Ernest Henry or an Olympic Dam to make it worthwhile exploring under that much cover. Why not just drill the obvious Mag and gravity anomalies first, seeing as the depth of cover is pretty thick?
Given there is 300-ish metres of barren cover, I am wondering...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ENR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
74.0¢ |
Change
0.105(16.5%) |
Mkt cap ! $333.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 65.0¢ | 75.5¢ | 64.5¢ | $4.288M | 6.062M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 28943 | 74.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 74.5¢ | 25401 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ENR (ASX) Chart |