Yeah I agree wrt definition of smearing. I see it as downhole contamination from a high grade interval. Less likely in RC holes these days because of face sampling hammers, unlikely in core holes.
Quoting intercepts incorporating sub-grade assays is a different issue. With gold I’d report the full altered interval because the nature of gold mineralisation means it can easily under-report as well as over-report. I have no issue with the way SMI have reported this intercept.
Ann: Significant Gold Intercept at Rise and Shine Deposit, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SMI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
64.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $411.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 62.5¢ | 65.0¢ | 62.3¢ | $420.0K | 667.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 7568 | 63.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 64.5¢ | 10691 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 11/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SMI (ASX) Chart |