I can't believe you're trying to give out exploration advice when so much of your post regarding lithium is wrong.
"As with today's Li results, early days so I won't get too carried away. However, these 3 main readings below show there is plenty of potential in the area and the next task is to now explore each general area for more Li-bearing pegmatites."
There were 45 rock chip samples, as seen in the table below, and their average Li2O % was 0.0033%. These results are bad, and both the company and you are trying to spin this to deceive other shareholders.
"The frustrating thing is more assay wait times because XRF hand readings can only pick up pathfinder minerals and not the Li directly."
This is correct, pXRF can't detect lithium, however a LIBS handheld detector can. And the LIBS detector would likely pick all these samples as below detectable levels.
"However, considering that RDT have now proven a Li resource nearby, we have plenty of potential and should be optimistic. I will explain below"
- Li2O 228 or 2.28% & Rb 1260ppm
- Li2O 206 or 2.06% & Rb 1140ppm
- Li2O 338 or 3.38% & Rb 43ppm"
So why are you trying to lie to all the other posters here about incorrect numbers? You don't even understand the difference between ppm and %. This is basic geochemistry in exploration. Rubidium in lithium exploration is bad - its called an LCT pegmatite, not an LCTR pegmatite. If you have rubidium, you've more than likely got lepidolite, zinnwaldite or polylithionite, and not spodumene.
|
Column 1 |
Column 2 |
Column 3 |
Column 4 |
Column 5 |
Column 6 |
Column 7 |
Column 8 |
Column 9 |
| 0 |
Sample ID |
Li2O ppm |
Cs_ppm |
Ta_ppm |
Rb_ppm |
Li2O % |
Cs % |
Ta % |
Rb % |
| 1 |
MARK047 |
228 |
6.7 |
20.5 |
1260 |
0.0228% |
0.0007% |
0.0021% |
0.1260% |
| 2 |
MARK049 |
46 |
4.2 |
32 |
363 |
0.0046% |
0.0004% |
0.0032% |
0.0363% |
| 3 |
MARK050 |
206 |
5.9 |
13.3 |
1140 |
0.0206% |
0.0006% |
0.0013% |
0.1140% |
| 4 |
MARK061 |
31 |
0.3 |
-0.1 |
2.2 |
0.0031% |
0.0000% |
0.0000% |
0.0002% |
| 5 |
MARK062 |
26 |
1.4 |
42.7 |
101 |
0.0026% |
0.0001% |
0.0043% |
0.0101% |
| 6 |
MARK063 |
87 |
7.5 |
4.8 |
1580 |
0.0087% |
0.0008% |
0.0005% |
0.1580% |
| 7 |
MARK064 |
24 |
1.2 |
125 |
111 |
0.0024% |
0.0001% |
0.0125% |
0.0111% |
| 8 |
MARK065 |
15 |
9.5 |
51.4 |
1290 |
0.0015% |
0.0010% |
0.0051% |
0.1290% |
| 9 |
MARK066 |
3 |
4.8 |
8.8 |
909 |
0.0003% |
0.0005% |
0.0009% |
0.0909% |
| 10 |
MARK067 |
4 |
43.7 |
4.4 |
6030 |
0.0004% |
0.0044% |
0.0004% |
0.6030% |
| 11 |
MARK074 |
11 |
3.3 |
0.7 |
212 |
0.0011% |
0.0003% |
0.0001% |
0.0212% |
| 12 |
MARK075 |
6 |
3.3 |
4.5 |
353 |
0.0006% |
0.0003% |
0.0005% |
0.0353% |
| 13 |
MARK076 |
4 |
3.1 |
5.7 |
298 |
0.0004% |
0.0003% |
0.0006% |
0.0298% |
| 14 |
MARK077 |
15 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
175 |
0.0015% |
0.0002% |
0.0002% |
0.0175% |
| 15 |
MARK079 |
18 |
4.2 |
1.4 |
344 |
0.0018% |
0.0004% |
0.0001% |
0.0344% |
| 16 |
MARK081 |
4 |
2 |
6.8 |
211 |
0.0004% |
0.0002% |
0.0007% |
0.0211% |
| 17 |
MARK082 |
3 |
4.7 |
2.4 |
479 |
0.0003% |
0.0005% |
0.0002% |
0.0479% |
| 18 |
MARK084 |
72 |
5.3 |
1.6 |
368 |
0.0072% |
0.0005% |
0.0002% |
0.0368% |
| 19 |
MARK089 |
5 |
1.5 |
5 |
409 |
0.0005% |
0.0002% |
0.0005% |
0.0409% |
| 20 |
MARK090 |
6 |
3.3 |
1.1 |
535 |
0.0006% |
0.0003% |
0.0001% |
0.0535% |
| 21 |
MARK091 |
12 |
9.5 |
3.1 |
916 |
0.0012% |
0.0010% |
0.0003% |
0.0916% |
| 22 |
MARK092 |
10 |
5.4 |
2.3 |
517 |
0.0010% |
0.0005% |
0.0002% |
0.0517% |
| 23 |
MARK093 |
17 |
8.3 |
4.4 |
713 |
0.0017% |
0.0008% |
0.0004% |
0.0713% |
| 24 |
MARK094 |
4 |
4.5 |
9.7 |
479 |
0.0004% |
0.0005% |
0.0010% |
0.0479% |
| 25 |
MARK095 |
9 |
0.5 |
12.6 |
54 |
0.0009% |
0.0001% |
0.0013% |
0.0054% |
| 26 |
MARK096 |
5 |
4.5 |
8.5 |
545 |
0.0005% |
0.0005% |
0.0009% |
0.0545% |
| 27 |
MARK096 |
10 |
4.5 |
8.3 |
537 |
0.0010% |
0.0005% |
0.0008% |
0.0537% |
| 28 |
MARK097 |
3 |
6.7 |
5.7 |
753 |
0.0003% |
0.0007% |
0.0006% |
0.0753% |
| 29 |
MARK098 |
3 |
6.5 |
3.9 |
793 |
0.0003% |
0.0007% |
0.0004% |
0.0793% |
| 30 |
MARK099 |
6 |
10.8 |
1 |
1100 |
0.0006% |
0.0011% |
0.0001% |
0.1100% |
| 31 |
MARK100 |
19 |
0.3 |
30.4 |
11.8 |
0.0019% |
0.0000% |
0.0030% |
0.0012% |
| 32 |
MARK101 |
45 |
4.5 |
93.8 |
638 |
0.0045% |
0.0005% |
0.0094% |
0.0638% |
| 33 |
MARK102 |
95 |
3.9 |
62.3 |
455 |
0.0095% |
0.0004% |
0.0062% |
0.0455% |
| 34 |
MARK103 |
338 |
1.3 |
86.9 |
42.8 |
0.0338% |
0.0001% |
0.0087% |
0.0043% |
| 35 |
MARK104 |
31 |
0.7 |
46.4 |
48.4 |
0.0031% |
0.0001% |
0.0046% |
0.0048% |
| 36 |
MARK105 |
3 |
0.9 |
72.6 |
61.6 |
0.0003% |
0.0001% |
0.0073% |
0.0062% |
| 37 |
MARK121 |
2 |
4.5 |
6.3 |
651 |
0.0002% |
0.0005% |
0.0006% |
0.0651% |
| 38 |
MARK122 |
1 |
0.7 |
8.2 |
103 |
0.0001% |
0.0001% |
0.0008% |
0.0103% |
| 39 |
MARK123 |
4 |
4.4 |
0.3 |
609 |
0.0004% |
0.0004% |
0.0000% |
0.0609% |
| 40 |
MARK124 |
15 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
361 |
0.0015% |
0.0003% |
0.0004% |
0.0361% |
| 41 |
MARK125 |
4 |
3.3 |
2.1 |
554 |
0.0004% |
0.0003% |
0.0002% |
0.0554% |
| 42 |
MARK126 |
2 |
5.6 |
4.4 |
556 |
0.0002% |
0.0006% |
0.0004% |
0.0556% |
| 43 |
MARK128 |
13 |
7 |
0.7 |
1420 |
0.0013% |
0.0007% |
0.0001% |
0.1420% |
| 44 |
MARK129 |
6 |
3.6 |
9.7 |
645 |
0.0006% |
0.0004% |
0.0010% |
0.0645% |
| 45 |
MARK130 |
8 |
4.5 |
8.4 |
547 |
0.0008% |
0.0005% |
0.0008% |
0.0547% |
| 46 |
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE |
0.0033% |
0.0005% |
0.0018% |
0.0651% |
But go on, put the people who are posting correct information on ignore and keep feeding that echo chamber of yours.
(20min delay)