(1) drill direction 214' - the plan in the announcement is arse about and confusing - new
(2) that the strike was West of the dotted white TA7 area not in it - new (now confirmed in the valley by AGM)
(3) showed you by reference to GSWA geo map the actual NW-SE "structural corridor" referred to in the announcement - new (now confirmed by AGM)
(4) the fact that cross-section C-D had been left off the announcement - new (that stuff up was fixed on the plan in the AGM slide package)
(5) speculated with the red arrows the up dip direction of the pegs - new - should I ph*toshop out the rail line??
Your green arrows are the down dip direction - but the 250m zone is already 300m to 500m deep at that point - getting too deep?? - the AGM has confirmed near term focus on along strike in the valley with possibility it is blind but getting shallower
(6) speculated that it could surface up dip in the SW towards the rail line at those red mapped outcrops of TA6 - new
Far from trying to scare people - I said my interpretation gave hope to holders -
- if it extends to TA6 that's a decent up dip (shallow) distance X a decent along strike distance - subject to it being mineralised.
The geo's will be able to project the 250m zone to surface up dip, I didn't bother with the trig calculations, hence DYOR and AIMO.
The likes I got understood my post.
You champ, just pile on the crap, how predictable for the RDN threads.
My favourite so far, amongst so much abuse from the gang of bullies, is being memed as a "pig in swill" by @TrayonRanger
C'mon bring it, water off a duck's back, what will it be next???
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)