I can't find anything written about what efficiency means, but I'd assumed that it worked like this (because this is how factors normally would work):
(Normal uranium is about 0.7% enriched and to use it in a normal reactor you need to be about 3%-5% enriched, which is a target of about 800% enrichment).
A factor of 1 means that your process does nothing to the uranium (its still at 100% of its original enrichment). A factor of 1.01 (gaseous diffusion) means that to get to 800% you will need to run your process about 200 times (due to compound interest its not 700 times). I think that's what they call a cascade where the one plant does the gaseous diffusion stuff multiple times in a row. If you have a factor of 1.25 (centrifuge) then that's 25 times better than a 1.01 enrichment. With a 1.25 plant you need to run the process about 8 times to get to 800%. However even if we have a factor of 2 then we run the process 3 times (and obviously a factor of 8 or higher would mean we only run the process once).
It gets a little more complex because when you have run a few rounds of enrichment and are half way to your goal you have ended up with your enriched uranium, and some low % tails. You can start to ignore the tails and focus on only enriching the higher % uranium, which decreases your cost. Of course if uranium is expensive or your enrichment process has a high factor and is cheap then you can continue to use your tails for longer. Tails often have 0.2% rather than 0.7% in natural uranium, so that's light work for a process with efficiency of 3 or 4, but a lot of work for centrifuges.
Google won't give me anything better as supporting evidence though - the best I could find was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enriched_uranium, which says that "centrifuges are a factor of 20" [times more efficient than gaseous diffusion plants]. Which is consistent with the difference between 1.01 and 1.25 (remember compound interest).
Does anyone know for sure how this works?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Silex AGM Presentation - 2017
I can't find anything written about what efficiency means, but...
Featured News
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$5.32 |
Change
0.220(4.31%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.259B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.99 | $5.45 | $4.94 | $35.13M | 6.828M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1054 | $5.31 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$5.33 | 500 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 400 | 5.500 |
2 | 370 | 5.450 |
1 | 250 | 5.330 |
1 | 200 | 5.300 |
1 | 1000 | 5.270 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.350 | 415 | 1 |
5.450 | 1928 | 2 |
5.470 | 700 | 1 |
5.480 | 18055 | 5 |
5.500 | 46812 | 11 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 01/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
$5.33 |
  |
Change
0.220 ( 4.32 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
$4.97 | $5.45 | $4.97 | 436526 | ||
Last updated 15.59pm 01/05/2024 ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
BPH
BPH ENERGY LTD
David Breeze, MD & Executive Chairman
David Breeze
MD & Executive Chairman
SPONSORED BY The Market Online