I did write a longer reply and then accidentally deleted it.
Anyway point made, the resource is not 65%, the product is 63%
thanks for seeing the logic EastWest, I thought it was obvious
why can CAP supergrade to 70%, why cant HAV do that ???
the Co's are an obvious comparison, and CAP ore is 15% Fe while
HAVs is up to 30% Fe
According to CAP Fe pricing, 62% is $ 65/t while 70% is over $100/t,
seems like its worth the trouble
we have the low impurity etc etc
I did write a longer reply and then accidentally deleted it....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add HAV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
19.0¢ |
Change
0.005(2.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $60.16M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 19.5¢ | 19.5¢ | 19.0¢ | $11.97K | 62.15K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22021 | 19.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0¢ | 6000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.53pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HAV (ASX) Chart |