I did write a longer reply and then accidentally deleted it.
Anyway point made, the resource is not 65%, the product is 63%
thanks for seeing the logic EastWest, I thought it was obvious
why can CAP supergrade to 70%, why cant HAV do that ???
the Co's are an obvious comparison, and CAP ore is 15% Fe while
HAVs is up to 30% Fe
According to CAP Fe pricing, 62% is $ 65/t while 70% is over $100/t,
seems like its worth the trouble
we have the low impurity etc etc
I did write a longer reply and then accidentally deleted it....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add HAV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
17.0¢ |
Change
-0.010(5.56%) |
Mkt cap ! $53.82M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 17.0¢ | 17.0¢ | 16.5¢ | $65.55K | 388.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186665 | 17.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0¢ | 50000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.00pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HAV (ASX) Chart |