Yep, this is written a number of times "in the absence of a Superior Proposal"
"The Board of Directors of Spark Infrastructure unanimously recommends that Securityholders vote in favour of the Schemes at the scheme meetings, in the absence of a Superior Proposal and subject to an independent expert concluding in the independent expert’s report (and continuing to conclude) that the Schemes are in the best interests of Spark Infrastructure securityholders."
I also note due diligence was granted on a non-exclusive basis, but not sure if that is superseded by moving Scheme Implementation Deed.
I'm not a lawyer!
Minters give a decent write up/overview of the process here:
https://www.minterellison.com/articles/how-a-scheme-of-arrangement-works
