'Must' is a big assumption. The common assumption would have to be that they would account for it in the contract (stand down rates). You've made your point 100 times - fair play to you if you're right, but maybe, maybe, maybe just wait until all the numbers are in; rather than beating a horse that you've already resurrected a few times for no reason.
In the end, it matters not one iota, provided the company can pay for it. What is the point of you posting incessantly on a stock that you don't own, surmising outcomes that will likely show to be materially irrelevant? Is it to feel good about being right, a warped public service fantasy, or just to annoy people for no reason?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BYE
- Ann: SM69 E2 Well Cased and Cemented
Ann: SM69 E2 Well Cased and Cemented, page-9
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)