Hi minimoke, I must say I am having trouble understanding all of this. But, what I think I know is this. Synlait buys a property only after covenants were removed, then it builds a plant. A court reinstates the covenants. So they built the plant during the time there were no covenants, so the plant can stay. But now the covenants have been reinstated they can not build or extend any more of the plant. Would this be the correct way to understand it?
Hi minimoke, I must say I am having trouble understanding all of...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 221 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SM1 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
37.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $80.87M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 36.0¢ | 37.0¢ | 35.5¢ | $43.97K | 119.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 9730 | 36.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 36.5¢ | 2670 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.34pm 26/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SM1 (ASX) Chart |