"Part of the basis for my position is the effect of the...

"Part of the basis for my position is the effect of the covenants on potential quarry operations. So in essence Synliats recent concession proves I was right. I only reviewed my view AFTER Synlaits concession. Had Synlait held this new position right from the start my opinion would have been different. Quite obviously Synlait now see the extent of the problem and risk - if there was none they would not have made the concession at this eleventh hour)"

The transcript for the call of your so called "concession" that changed your view so dramatically is dated the 12th of September. Your rant, however, started on the 11th of September until you backflipped on the 17th of September. Synlait didn't make a "...concession at this eleventh hour..." like you have said. Instead you just didn't see it and conceived your rant based of your own personal incorrect presumptions. What makes you think that it has not always been Synlait's stance all along to not oppose a quarry? Your own presumptions. Regardless, whether Synlait would oppose or not is Synlait's right to do so. So it wouldn't change anything. The only reason that Synlait is being diplomatic is because of the fact that they are a publically traded company.