This looks positive, but there might be capex required for a 3rd absorber to make nameplate TJ/d? My opinion only, I am a Chem Eng but this is not my area expertise at all. I suspect adding a 3rd similar absorber in parallel would not be too challenging, but time and capex would be required. The fact that they settled at 22.5 suggests that is the max stable, steady state flow per absorber?
This looks positive, but there might be capex required for a 3rd...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add COE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $594.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 22.5¢ | 22.5¢ | 22.0¢ | $593.7K | 2.672M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 290435 | 21.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 22.5¢ | 205975 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| COE (ASX) Chart |