This looks positive, but there might be capex required for a 3rd absorber to make nameplate TJ/d? My opinion only, I am a Chem Eng but this is not my area expertise at all. I suspect adding a 3rd similar absorber in parallel would not be too challenging, but time and capex would be required. The fact that they settled at 22.5 suggests that is the max stable, steady state flow per absorber?
Ann: Sole Gas Sales Agreements to commence on 01/01/2021, page-3
Add COE (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
23.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $607.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 23.0¢ | 23.0¢ | 22.5¢ | $216.8K | 944.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 522592 | 22.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0¢ | 119422 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
23.0¢ |
Change
0.000 ( 1.81 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 23.0¢ | 23.0¢ | 22.5¢ | 49820 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 27/05/2024 ? | |||||
| COE (ASX) Chart |