Interesting idea. JK did indicate something like that in a quarterly update to investors, but he also seemed to say it'd be a minor reduction in 2 or 3 customers. Not a complete reduction. As I've said, only the most ludicrous JK fanboy actually expected that $500m was a realistic figure and expected result. Those are, funnily enough, still those suggesting that walking away from the $500m case was a strategic victory.
In my posts, I've been using $100m as a potential judgement amount if we were proved correct. An 80% reduction, and still worth putting $2m security at risk if you had any reasonable shot at victory.
I dont specifically recall what he was suing ASX under, but I dont think it was a negligence section, so may not be under tort law. Chillingout may know. I thought he was contesting for intentional disregard of some sort, perhaps contractual, not a negligent mistake. I dont think intentional disregard is a tort. Not a legal expert though.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: SP1 delisted from ASX
Interesting idea. JK did indicate something like that in a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 334 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries