Perhaps you'd like to take a shot at the question that no ISX fanboy here has been able to answer:
In the period preceding the looming expiry of the performance rights, management took actions that resulted in a very temporary enormous spike in "revenue" that was loss-making, unrelated to the company's core business and produced no follow-up business. As a direct result of those actions, 40% of the company was handed over to JK and associates, gratis.
So... how were those actions in the interests of shareholders?
SP1 Price at posting:
$1.07 Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
