A few questions, you claim that holes 94,95,99 are duster’s, and...

A few questions, you claim that holes 94,95,99 are duster’s, and when you look at the diagram you are using, the same one that was in yesterday’s announcement, all these holes are marked white, and a look at the legend in the same diagram says that the holes marked in white are results pending. I can’t find any results of holes 94,95,98,99 in any previous announcements, happy to be corrected, if I am wrong. Holes drilled below 84, both 85 and 89 have both intersected gold, with 91, also marked in white, results pending. The two holes announced yesterday that didn’t intersect mineralisation where holes 96 and 97 are marked on the Loftus McKay shoot, no where close to hole 84, there actually isn’t a hole 96 marked anywhere, but there are two 98’s marked, so I believe that the 98 on the Loftus McKay shoot is actually hole 96. MRE, you state that you can’t get any decent tonnes or ounces in a resource estimate. Firstly I am interested to know your qualifications, in being able to put a resource estimate together, and if you have done one, I am interested in your analysis of doing such an estimate and your results.