Ann: Spodumene mineralised pegmatite intersected in all 8 holes, page-27

Agree, it feels like they are trying to pump out content without some proper DD and revision. Getting the first line of the report wrong with RC instead of DD is not a good look.


I believe their ownership numbers for LLL are also wrong, and they question the steepness of the pegmatites. If they had looked at any pegmatites in Mali they would of realised they are all the same.


The exploration target of 22mt is a throw away line as well, I saw them do IR1 in which they offered, low base and high case scenarios. I mention this because LLL initial exploration target was 15mt and now it’s 221mt. So the upside can be huge.


Saying all this the report is extensive, discussed mali well and highlights the potential. No doubt the reports will get better over time, it’s a great starting point in my view