They are "underwritter", means they have mandate by agreement to take the shortfall if any.
I just can't understand the theory that, due to this, the underwriter should have sold their existing positions down to $2.5 level? @maxybro
Do you mean the underwritters have their own mandate of asset allocation or what?
They are "underwritter", means they have mandate by agreement to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 45 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SBM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
21.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $171.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 21.5¢ | 21.8¢ | 21.0¢ | $513.4K | 2.402M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 807808 | 21.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.5¢ | 78837 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SBM (ASX) Chart |