@Jacko22 ... " I'd say clearly that if SGQ don't have anything close to a resource, however small, they have an obligation to disclose that fact."
JP has already stated in one of those videos that the resource at Stricklands is too small by itself, which is why they did the Cathedrals resource drilling last year. So your stating that JP is not acting in your understanding of the listing rules, is that correct??
Mind you listing rules clearly state abiding by JORC guidelines for reporting entities, but there are many "errors" in many announcements that just by chance always make the finds at Mt Alexander look much larger than they are.. Of course it's all accidental...
I was begging holders to do a lot more research on what SGQ didn't have over a year ago, but instead all the holders just wanted to defend their position instead of do the real in depth research on past drilling. My understanding of listing rules is pretty good BTW
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SGQ
- Ann: St George Commences Drilling at Paterson
Ann: St George Commences Drilling at Paterson, page-147
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $27.21M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
SGQ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable