The autonomy in aircraft maintenance and management brings both...

The autonomy in aircraft maintenance and management brings both advantages and disadvantages. On the positive side, it allows for additional energy and time to be directed toward other primary responsibilities, such as expanding sales, enhancing quality, and increasing the number of captures within a shorter timeframe. However, concerns arise regarding the aspect of quality improvement, as there is an observed decline in precision and quality due to the implementation of new sensors. Furthermore, there is a self-serving managerial inclination to compromise quality in order to reduce costs. Therefore, achieving quality improvement is not feasible under the current circumstances.

In contrast, despite smaller companies offering superior products at a lower cost (even with an additional subscription version, as observed in those companies), attracting additional clients becomes challenging. Consequently, the number of clients is expected to gradually decline in the coming years under the existing circumstances.

In the best-case scenario, an outsourced aviation company (or a few small mapping outsourcing companies) might begin capturing images with fewer aviation headaches for Aerometrex (there is a considerable argument supporting this, which I will omit). However, with fewer clients, financial limitations will hinder the ability to conduct extra captures to cover additional time and area.It follows a straightforward logic. Best of luck, board members and shareholders.