Selling assets to stave off someone buying the company is not a good enough reason to sell them.
That alone is enough to make me think these guys really have no idea.
Its a bit extreme really isn't it.
Maybe if they weren't so useless at marketing the company the share price wouldn't be so low. Maybe they should spend some of that $3.5m a year in management fees on PR.
Maybe get Damon Neaves back. At least he knows how to market. His company which is only 3 years old - which has nothing but hope - is worth almost as much as our company which has been going 18 years.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TAP
- Ann: Strategic Review
Ann: Strategic Review, page-47
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)