I'm rubbishing the ongoing BS headlines that don't match the content. As adam a said it only damages the brand and turns away investors that might otherwise have been happy to back good exploration management through any share price.
"Strong" results should only ever be drill hits, grade and widths.
Prospective, promising, encouraging for anything else. A wider problem than just SGQ.
The last headline was "Breakthrough Results ..." for MT/AMT for crying out loud.
Breakthrough is 16m @ 13% nickel, not lies, damn lies and geophysics.
Old mate just went directly ad hominem, rather than offer countering arguments to mine, in a constructive manner. Thing is, they know what I am saying is right, or wouldn't have had to go there.
I was a holder up until recently. I think there is some potential, with time and money. But I won't hold again when they are acting like they're clutching at straws.
SGQ Price at posting:
9.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
