The mistake was obvious and whilst 100 tons is a shed load in today's market, the number of potential uses is huge and it's not all nanospheres and coated silicon anodes.
Have you guys looked at graphene paint for example, corrosive-free steel without the need for zinc. Low tech, cheaper than the alternative and massive market, sounds like disruptive technology to me.
What about graphene oxide in cement. c.50% increase in tensile strength with c.1% Graphene Oxide added. A lot of cement used the days.
The high tech applications will be infinitely higher purity, higher cost and use next to nothing but the low tech applications could lead to massive demand imo.
James, let me just say I commend you on your recent civility. When you are bearish, you don't need to be a tosser, so I welcome the changes you have made, irrespective of whether it was conscious or natural evolutionary maturity.
The mistake was obvious and whilst 100 tons is a shed load in...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
