Ann: Successful A$15 million placement and launch of SPP, page-20

I agree with yr sentiments 'but' the issue is eos technologies are being over taken by mega primes with deep pockets as posted many times.
Example now the UK is testing a thales dew laser on a UK military vehicle,so thats thales ,france rheinmetal germany,LM US ,israel etc all appear to be more advanced than eos in the development of eos's core business of laser.
What does eos know about hypersonics,even c4edge ,now dew laser.Spacelink with no satellites.
collinear ?
The remote weapons stations ,global primes will continue to develop their remote weapons systems/efficiency ,can eos afford to.?
Again imo only someone like boeing Australia plus other 'real' primes are required to partner eos divisions otherwise eos with no money will continue to self destruct which is a shame because again as posted many times Ben was ahead in understanding the technologies maybe excluding china but had no idea what was required in financing the developments and competing in this sector.
ps hmm now to find that $10m acquisition lense figure.