We've been through this else where and I have...

We've been through this else where and I have misrepresented anything or misunderstood despite protestations I would agree with what your saying now put it in context with all 3 paragraphs and you come the conclusion I stated that" it's interesting that * used 406k for CZs at 1 well called Boysdaba at GR to ADD TO THE overall Paradox resource which sat at 1.504 million to total 1.910 million remember the 1.504 million was calculated on multiple wells as much as 12 in total and the CZs from that calculation alone were 542k so for * to say that boysdaba 1 well only has 406k from just CZs then how much would 6 GR wells with sampling from Mississippian and Devonian included give 12 million Mt ???? This the point I was trying to make anyway I'm a bit over it now it was more than likely a typo or an over reach by * .

Regards TT