Corporate governance, followed by the bs that ground conditions caused the delay, yet did they notify the market that a delay was affecting a fixed delivery contract at the very start? Panels would have been constructed after ground conditions improved, that they advised the market, maybe those that sold today could have sold at say $2.00. Or the fact that a blow out of $50 odd million is only picked up at the end?
No fraud has been identified, yet the withholding news and blowing $50 mil in fixes, at the lowest level possible (site project manager level) is not fraudulent?
Corporate governance, followed by the bs that ground conditions...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
